• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Common flaws in forensic reports.

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol 54(6), Dec 2023, 413-417; doi:10.1037/pro0000531

Flawed forensic psychological reports can create unfortunate, sometimes harmful, consequences, including (a) misinforming and misleading judges and juries; (b) blocking people who have been wronged from justice and vindication; (c) depriving people who have done nothing wrong of their savings, their business, their home, their children, their liberty, or their lives; and (d) allowing those who have done wrong to escape justice. This article discusses six common categories of flawed forensic psychological reports and presents seven steps to avoid writing flawed reports. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 01/15/2024 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice