Following intergroup conflict, reconciliation efforts most often focus on relationships among people. Though human-centric approaches are valuable, we propose people’s engagement in reconciliation is also related to their attitudes toward the broader natural world. With a sample of 233 undergraduate non-Indigenous Canadian students who completed an online survey, we investigated the relationships among connectedness to nature, animal–human continuity, moral expansiveness, and support for reconciliation. All variables correlated positively, though the correlation between animal–human continuity and support for reconciliation was not significant. As well, age positively and significantly correlated with connectedness to nature, whereas gender (coded 0 = male, 1 = female) positively and significantly correlated with animal–human continuity, moral expansiveness, and support for reconciliation. To better understand how connectedness to nature and animal–human continuity related to moral expansiveness and support for reconciliation, we conducted mediation analyses. Participants who felt more connected to nature had more positive attitudes toward reconciliation, because they were more morally expansive. A similar pattern emerged for animal–human continuity, though only for women. These findings imply that strengthening peoples’ connection to nature or beliefs about how humans and other animals are similar, and consequently extending peoples’ circles of moral concern, may increase support for reconciliation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)