Abstract
We examine the impact of two universal preventive interventions in first grade on the growth of aggressive/disruptive behavior
in grades 1–3 and 6–12 through the application of a latent transition growth mixture model (LT-GMM). Both the classroom-centered
and family-centered interventions were designed to reduce the risk for later conduct problems by enhancing the child behavior
management practices of teachers and parents, respectively. We first modeled growth trajectories in each of the two time periods
with separate GMMs. We then associated latent trajectory classes of aggressive/disruptive behavior across the two time periods
using a transition model for the corresponding latent class variables. Subsequently, we tested whether the interventions had
direct effects on trajectory class membership in grades 1–3 and 6–12. For males, both the classroom-centered and family-centered
interventions had significant direct effects on trajectory class membership in grades 6–12, whereas only the classroom-centered
intervention had a significant effect on class membership in grades 1–3. Significant direct effects for females were confined
to grades 1–3 for the classroom-centered intervention. Further analyses revealed that both the classroom-centered and family-centered
intervention males were significantly more likely than control males to transition from the high trajectory class in grades
1–3 to a low class in grades 6–12. Effects for females in classroom-centered interventions went in the hypothesized direction
but did not reach significance.
in grades 1–3 and 6–12 through the application of a latent transition growth mixture model (LT-GMM). Both the classroom-centered
and family-centered interventions were designed to reduce the risk for later conduct problems by enhancing the child behavior
management practices of teachers and parents, respectively. We first modeled growth trajectories in each of the two time periods
with separate GMMs. We then associated latent trajectory classes of aggressive/disruptive behavior across the two time periods
using a transition model for the corresponding latent class variables. Subsequently, we tested whether the interventions had
direct effects on trajectory class membership in grades 1–3 and 6–12. For males, both the classroom-centered and family-centered
interventions had significant direct effects on trajectory class membership in grades 6–12, whereas only the classroom-centered
intervention had a significant effect on class membership in grades 1–3. Significant direct effects for females were confined
to grades 1–3 for the classroom-centered intervention. Further analyses revealed that both the classroom-centered and family-centered
intervention males were significantly more likely than control males to transition from the high trajectory class in grades
1–3 to a low class in grades 6–12. Effects for females in classroom-centered interventions went in the hypothesized direction
but did not reach significance.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-14
- DOI 10.1007/s11121-011-0216-7
- Authors
- Hanno Petras, JBS International, Inc., 5515 Security Lane, Suite 800, North Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
- Katherine Masyn, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Nick Ialongo, Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Journal Prevention Science
- Online ISSN 1573-6695
- Print ISSN 1389-4986