Abstract
The question of what is shared in joint action has been discussed mainly with reference to the notion of collective intentionality.
The problem of how to account for intentional states that are shared between two or more jointly engaged creatures is particularly
relevant for actions that involve distal intentions. Yet there is another important kind of joint action, which so far has
received less interest, at least by philosophers. This kind of action can be described in terms of a shared motor engagement
of two or more creatures with their surroundings. In this paper, I address the question of what is shared in such motor engagements.
I suggest that joint motor actions come off through sharing particular kinds of feelings. In order to flesh out what it means
to share feelings, I introduce the notion of ‘cross-creature embodiment’—the idea that a certain type of embodied mental event
is constitutively tied to the body state of another, perceptually present creature in broadly the same way in which it is
tied to the experiencing creature’s own. I end by suggesting that this notion makes available a new, albeit tentative, interpretation
of recent neuroscientific evidence.
The problem of how to account for intentional states that are shared between two or more jointly engaged creatures is particularly
relevant for actions that involve distal intentions. Yet there is another important kind of joint action, which so far has
received less interest, at least by philosophers. This kind of action can be described in terms of a shared motor engagement
of two or more creatures with their surroundings. In this paper, I address the question of what is shared in such motor engagements.
I suggest that joint motor actions come off through sharing particular kinds of feelings. In order to flesh out what it means
to share feelings, I introduce the notion of ‘cross-creature embodiment’—the idea that a certain type of embodied mental event
is constitutively tied to the body state of another, perceptually present creature in broadly the same way in which it is
tied to the experiencing creature’s own. I end by suggesting that this notion makes available a new, albeit tentative, interpretation
of recent neuroscientific evidence.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-23
- DOI 10.1007/s13164-011-0051-6
- Authors
- Axel Seemann, Department of Philosophy, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, USA
- Journal Review of Philosophy and Psychology
- Online ISSN 1878-5166
- Print ISSN 1878-5158