• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Does the introduction of comprehensive smokefree legislation lead to a decrease in population smoking prevalence?

Abstract

Aims:  To investigate changes in population smoking prevalence in jurisdictions which have implemented comprehensive smokefree legislation, taking into account long-term trends in smoking behaviour.

Design:  Interrupted time series analysis of population-level survey data using segmented regression.

Setting:  21 countries, American states or Canadian provinces which have implemented comprehensive smokefree legislation.

Participants:  Respondents sampled in large representative surveys of smoking prevalence.

Measurements:  For each jurisdiction, segmented regression models quantify any upwards or downwards trend in smoking prevalence prior to the introduction of smokefree legislation, any immediate change in the level of smoking prevalence at the time smokefree legislation was introduced, and any change in the trend in smoking prevalence post-legislation compared to the pre-legislation period.

Findings:  In all but three locations there was a statistically significant decline in smoking prevalence prior to the introduction of smokefree legislation. In two locations, Washington and the Republic of Ireland, there was an immediate decline in the level of smoking prevalence at the introduction of legislation. In six American states there was a significant change in the rate of decline in smoking prevalence, with smoking prevalence declining more steeply in the post-legislation period compared to the pre-legislation period. No change in the level or trend of population smoking prevalence was seen in 13 of the 21 locations studied.

Conclusions:  The introduction of comprehensive smokefree legislation increased the rate at which smoking prevalence was declining in some locations, but in the majority of jurisdictions had no measureable impact on existing trends in smoking prevalence.

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 03/25/2011 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice