Abstract
Emotions and their psychophysiological correlates are thought to play an important role in decision-making under risk. We
used a novel gambling task to measure psychophysiological responses during selection of explicitly presented risky options
and feedback processing. Active-choice trials, in which the participant had to select the size of bet, were compared to fixed-bet,
no-choice trials. We further tested how the chances of winning and bet size affected choice behavior and psychophysiological
arousal. Individual differences in impulsive and risk-taking traits were assessed. The behavioral results showed sensitivity
to the choice requirement and to the chances of winning: Participants were faster to make a response on no-choice trials and
when the chances of winning were high. In active-choice trials, electrodermal activity (EDA) increased with bet size during
both selection and processing of losses. Cardiac responses were sensitive to choice uncertainty: Stronger selection-related
heart rate (HR) decelerations were observed in trials with lower chances of winning, particularly on active-choice trials.
Finally, betting behavior and psychophysiological responsiveness were moderately correlated with self-reported impulsivity-related
traits. In conclusion, we demonstrate that psychophysiological arousal covaries with risk-sensitive decision-making outside
of a learning context. Our results further highlight the differential sensitivities of EDA and HR to psychological features
of the decision scenario.
used a novel gambling task to measure psychophysiological responses during selection of explicitly presented risky options
and feedback processing. Active-choice trials, in which the participant had to select the size of bet, were compared to fixed-bet,
no-choice trials. We further tested how the chances of winning and bet size affected choice behavior and psychophysiological
arousal. Individual differences in impulsive and risk-taking traits were assessed. The behavioral results showed sensitivity
to the choice requirement and to the chances of winning: Participants were faster to make a response on no-choice trials and
when the chances of winning were high. In active-choice trials, electrodermal activity (EDA) increased with bet size during
both selection and processing of losses. Cardiac responses were sensitive to choice uncertainty: Stronger selection-related
heart rate (HR) decelerations were observed in trials with lower chances of winning, particularly on active-choice trials.
Finally, betting behavior and psychophysiological responsiveness were moderately correlated with self-reported impulsivity-related
traits. In conclusion, we demonstrate that psychophysiological arousal covaries with risk-sensitive decision-making outside
of a learning context. Our results further highlight the differential sensitivities of EDA and HR to psychological features
of the decision scenario.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-15
- DOI 10.3758/s13415-011-0025-2
- Authors
- Bettina Studer, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, England UK
- Luke Clark, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, England UK
- Journal Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
- Online ISSN 1531-135X
- Print ISSN 1530-7026