Abstract
The majority of mindfulness intervention studies do not include active control groups. To examine potential unique effects
of mindfulness practice and to study the mechanism responsible for beneficial mental health effects associated with mindfulness-based
interventions, the present study compared mindfulness meditation with an active control group in a randomised controlled trial.
A short-term mindfulness-based intervention (n = 46) was compared with both an active control group—relaxation training (n = 40)—and an inactive wait-list group (n = 40) on self-reported mindfulness and decentering, executive attention, psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, and
coping style, in an adult working population with no prior meditation experience. Analyses of covariance showed that the mindfulness
group scored higher than the wait-list group on self-reported mindfulness and psychological well-being. However, no differences
were found on decentering, anxiety, depression, executive attention, or coping style. Moreover, the study failed to distinguish
any unique mindfulness effects since there were no differences between mindfulness and relaxation on any of the variables.
Simple mediation analyses, using a bootstrap approach, revealed that decentering acted as a mediator between self-reported
mindfulness and psychological well-being. The length of the intervention, the similarities between body scan exercises in
MBI and relaxation, and the absence of decentering effects may partly explain the lack of distinct MBI effects, suggesting
that MBIs aimed at increasing well-being and problem-focused coping whilst reducing psychological symptoms in a working population
should be longer than merely 4 weeks and include more than seven sessions.
of mindfulness practice and to study the mechanism responsible for beneficial mental health effects associated with mindfulness-based
interventions, the present study compared mindfulness meditation with an active control group in a randomised controlled trial.
A short-term mindfulness-based intervention (n = 46) was compared with both an active control group—relaxation training (n = 40)—and an inactive wait-list group (n = 40) on self-reported mindfulness and decentering, executive attention, psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, and
coping style, in an adult working population with no prior meditation experience. Analyses of covariance showed that the mindfulness
group scored higher than the wait-list group on self-reported mindfulness and psychological well-being. However, no differences
were found on decentering, anxiety, depression, executive attention, or coping style. Moreover, the study failed to distinguish
any unique mindfulness effects since there were no differences between mindfulness and relaxation on any of the variables.
Simple mediation analyses, using a bootstrap approach, revealed that decentering acted as a mediator between self-reported
mindfulness and psychological well-being. The length of the intervention, the similarities between body scan exercises in
MBI and relaxation, and the absence of decentering effects may partly explain the lack of distinct MBI effects, suggesting
that MBIs aimed at increasing well-being and problem-focused coping whilst reducing psychological symptoms in a working population
should be longer than merely 4 weeks and include more than seven sessions.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category ORIGINAL PAPER
- Pages 1-18
- DOI 10.1007/s12671-012-0142-1
- Authors
- Torbjörn Josefsson, School of Social and Health Sciences, Halmstad University, Box 823, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden
- Magnus Lindwall, Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Anders G. Broberg, Department of Psychology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Journal Mindfulness
- Online ISSN 1868-8535
- Print ISSN 1868-8527