Abstract
Late preterm (LP) birth (34 0/7 – 36 6/7 weeks’ gestation) accounts for nearly three-fourths of all preterm births, making
this population a sizeable public health concern. The immature fetal development associated with LP delivery increases the
risk of mortality and short-term medical complications. Which combination of maternal, fetal, or neonatal risk factors may
be most critical has only recently begun to be addressed, and whether LP birth’s disruptive impact on brain development will
exert adverse effects on neuropsychological functioning in childhood and adolescence has been understudied. Early data have
shown a graded response, with LP children often functioning better than very preterm children but worse than term children,
and with subtle intellectual and neuropsychological deficits in LP children compared with healthy children born at term gestational
age. Further characterization of the neuropsychological profile is required and would be best accomplished through prospective
longitudinal studies. Moreover, since moderate and LP births result in disparate medical and psychological outcomes, the common
methodology of combining these participants into a single research cohort to assess risk and outcome should be reconsidered.
The rapidly growing LP outcomes literature reinforces a critical principle: fetal development occurs along a dynamic maturational
continuum from conception to birth, with each successive gestational day likely to improve overall outcome.
this population a sizeable public health concern. The immature fetal development associated with LP delivery increases the
risk of mortality and short-term medical complications. Which combination of maternal, fetal, or neonatal risk factors may
be most critical has only recently begun to be addressed, and whether LP birth’s disruptive impact on brain development will
exert adverse effects on neuropsychological functioning in childhood and adolescence has been understudied. Early data have
shown a graded response, with LP children often functioning better than very preterm children but worse than term children,
and with subtle intellectual and neuropsychological deficits in LP children compared with healthy children born at term gestational
age. Further characterization of the neuropsychological profile is required and would be best accomplished through prospective
longitudinal studies. Moreover, since moderate and LP births result in disparate medical and psychological outcomes, the common
methodology of combining these participants into a single research cohort to assess risk and outcome should be reconsidered.
The rapidly growing LP outcomes literature reinforces a critical principle: fetal development occurs along a dynamic maturational
continuum from conception to birth, with each successive gestational day likely to improve overall outcome.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Review
- Pages 1-13
- DOI 10.1007/s11065-012-9210-5
- Authors
- Ida Sue Baron, Departments of Neurosciences and Pediatrics, Inova Children’s Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Fern R. Litman, Fairfax Neonatal Associates at Inova Children’s Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Margot D. Ahronovich, Fairfax Neonatal Associates at Inova Children’s Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Robin Baker, Fairfax Neonatal Associates at Inova Children’s Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Journal Neuropsychology Review
- Online ISSN 1573-6660
- Print ISSN 1040-7308