Abstract
The psychoanalytic relationship between patient and analyst has undergone a dramatic evolution over the years. As the illusion
of anonymity and neutrality of the analyst has dropped away, a more human engagement and intimacy has developed between them.
This paper explores the gains for both participants from such a change, using a clinical case to anchor the discussion. Following
up on the work of Ferenczi and Searles, concepts of shared process and mutual transformation are examined from both theoretical
and clinical perspectives. A concern remains, however, that issues of hierarchy and self-interest for the analyst still interfere
with a more intimate connection and greater benefits for both participants.
of anonymity and neutrality of the analyst has dropped away, a more human engagement and intimacy has developed between them.
This paper explores the gains for both participants from such a change, using a clinical case to anchor the discussion. Following
up on the work of Ferenczi and Searles, concepts of shared process and mutual transformation are examined from both theoretical
and clinical perspectives. A concern remains, however, that issues of hierarchy and self-interest for the analyst still interfere
with a more intimate connection and greater benefits for both participants.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-10
- DOI 10.1007/s10615-012-0413-2
- Authors
- Alan L. Wineburgh, 295 Central Park West, Office #4A, New York, NY 10024, USA
- Journal Clinical Social Work Journal
- Online ISSN 1573-3343
- Print ISSN 0091-1674