Abstract
In the past few years, new “practice doctorate” programs have been mounted by some schools of social work with traditional
Ph.D. programs. This trend is explored in relation to the purposes of doctoral education, specifically preparing stewards
of the discipline as compared to “stewards of the enterprise.” Arguments advanced for and against this development in social
work education are reviewed in the context of the emergence of practice doctorates in psychology, nursing and public health.
Characteristics of these new doctoral programs in social work, which all focus on clinical social work, are described. Wider
discussion of the concept and purposes of the “practice doctorate” in social work is needed in order to safeguard the gains
made in research education at the doctoral level and to advance practice-based knowledge and scholarship for the future.
Ph.D. programs. This trend is explored in relation to the purposes of doctoral education, specifically preparing stewards
of the discipline as compared to “stewards of the enterprise.” Arguments advanced for and against this development in social
work education are reviewed in the context of the emergence of practice doctorates in psychology, nursing and public health.
Characteristics of these new doctoral programs in social work, which all focus on clinical social work, are described. Wider
discussion of the concept and purposes of the “practice doctorate” in social work is needed in order to safeguard the gains
made in research education at the doctoral level and to advance practice-based knowledge and scholarship for the future.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-9
- DOI 10.1007/s10615-012-0392-3
- Authors
- Jeane Anastas, Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Lynn Videka, Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Journal Clinical Social Work Journal
- Online ISSN 1573-3343
- Print ISSN 0091-1674