Abstract
Persons with chronic disabilities report the lowest subjective well-being (SWB) in many countries. The gap in SWB compared
with the non-disabled population is smaller in some countries than in others. Data from the European Social Survey were analysed
in order to: (1) describe the inequality in SWB in 21 European countries; and (2) identify the main determinants of this inequality
in SWB. Data on a range of topics of a total of 40,605 persons, including 2,846 persons with serious chronic disabilities,
were used of the European Social Survey. SWB was measured using multi-item scales for ‘emotional well-being’ and ‘satisfying
life’. Variables on disability, socio-demographics (age, gender, household composition), socio-economic status (level of education,
net household income), participation (paid work, voluntary work, social contacts), and personal resources (supportive relationships,
social cohesion, vitality, optimism, resilience, perceived autonomy, perceived accomplishment, perceived capacity, perceived
engagement, perceived meaning and purpose) were entered stepwise in regression models of SWB. The results show that persons
with disabilities are in a disadvantaged position in terms of SWB in all countries. In the Northern countries, the gaps between
disabled and non-disabled persons are smaller than in Eastern European countries. In all countries inequality in SWB is explained
mostly by personal resources and not by the level of disability, socio-economic status or level of participation in work.
The implications of these findings for policy and practice (e.g. social cohesion and physical exercise programs) are discussed.
with the non-disabled population is smaller in some countries than in others. Data from the European Social Survey were analysed
in order to: (1) describe the inequality in SWB in 21 European countries; and (2) identify the main determinants of this inequality
in SWB. Data on a range of topics of a total of 40,605 persons, including 2,846 persons with serious chronic disabilities,
were used of the European Social Survey. SWB was measured using multi-item scales for ‘emotional well-being’ and ‘satisfying
life’. Variables on disability, socio-demographics (age, gender, household composition), socio-economic status (level of education,
net household income), participation (paid work, voluntary work, social contacts), and personal resources (supportive relationships,
social cohesion, vitality, optimism, resilience, perceived autonomy, perceived accomplishment, perceived capacity, perceived
engagement, perceived meaning and purpose) were entered stepwise in regression models of SWB. The results show that persons
with disabilities are in a disadvantaged position in terms of SWB in all countries. In the Northern countries, the gaps between
disabled and non-disabled persons are smaller than in Eastern European countries. In all countries inequality in SWB is explained
mostly by personal resources and not by the level of disability, socio-economic status or level of participation in work.
The implications of these findings for policy and practice (e.g. social cohesion and physical exercise programs) are discussed.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-16
- DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0036-6
- Authors
- Cretien van Campen, Netherlands Institute for Social Research|SCP, P.O. Box 16164, 2500 BD The Hague, The Netherlands
- Marc van Santvoort, Bureau Onderzoek en Analyse, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Journal Social Indicators Research
- Online ISSN 1573-0921
- Print ISSN 0303-8300