Abstract
This paper introduces the concept of the “racial dialectic” to describe the ways racial dialogues and policies have transformed
in the wake of Barack Obama’s historic election to the presidency of the United States of America. Using public statements
and behaviors from elected officials, pundits, and Obama himself as case study data, we examine the tension between what we
term the hard racial frame, the soft racial frame, and the racial counterframe in the public discourses. We conclude that
these competing frames produce a dialectic that has transformed the way racial issues are discussed and interpreted in the
wake of Obama’s election.
in the wake of Barack Obama’s historic election to the presidency of the United States of America. Using public statements
and behaviors from elected officials, pundits, and Obama himself as case study data, we examine the tension between what we
term the hard racial frame, the soft racial frame, and the racial counterframe in the public discourses. We conclude that
these competing frames produce a dialectic that has transformed the way racial issues are discussed and interpreted in the
wake of Obama’s election.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-20
- DOI 10.1007/s11133-012-9223-7
- Authors
- Adia Harvey Wingfield, Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Joe Feagin, Department of Sociology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Journal Qualitative Sociology
- Online ISSN 1573-7837
- Print ISSN 0162-0436