Abstract
Perceived improvement has been proposed as an important patient-reported outcome measure in mental health services evaluation.
One advantage of this measure is that it can indicate whether other outcome measures, as pre-post differences in symptoms,
correspond to a noticeable impact in patients’ lives, as assessed by themselves. This study investigated the association between
observer and self-reported symptomatic changes and perceived improvement by patients treated in two Brazilian outpatient mental
health services. Significant and positive correlations were found between perceived improvement scores and both pre-post differences,
obtained in observer-reported and patient-reported symptom scores. Nevertheless, scores of perceived improvement showed to
be more correlated to patient-reported than to the observer-rated symptomatic change score. In addition, a greater correlation
was found between perceived improvement scores and post-treatment symptom scores, compared to pre-treatment. These results
suggest that an improvement in symptom severity, measured by pre-post differences scores, corresponds to the patient perception
that he is actually better than before. However, the correlations found were moderate, suggesting that other factors may also
be related to perceived improvement and must be investigated in further studies.
One advantage of this measure is that it can indicate whether other outcome measures, as pre-post differences in symptoms,
correspond to a noticeable impact in patients’ lives, as assessed by themselves. This study investigated the association between
observer and self-reported symptomatic changes and perceived improvement by patients treated in two Brazilian outpatient mental
health services. Significant and positive correlations were found between perceived improvement scores and both pre-post differences,
obtained in observer-reported and patient-reported symptom scores. Nevertheless, scores of perceived improvement showed to
be more correlated to patient-reported than to the observer-rated symptomatic change score. In addition, a greater correlation
was found between perceived improvement scores and post-treatment symptom scores, compared to pre-treatment. These results
suggest that an improvement in symptom severity, measured by pre-post differences scores, corresponds to the patient perception
that he is actually better than before. However, the correlations found were moderate, suggesting that other factors may also
be related to perceived improvement and must be investigated in further studies.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-10
- DOI 10.1007/s11126-012-9206-6
- Authors
- Mário César Rezende Andrade, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio, 74, PPGPSI sala 1.53, São João del-Rei, MG 36301-160, Brazil
- Marina Bandeira, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio, 74, PPGPSI sala 1.53, São João del-Rei, MG 36301-160, Brazil
- Michel Perreault, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Douglas Mental Health University Institute Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Antonio Paulo Angélico, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio, 74, PPGPSI sala 1.53, São João del-Rei, MG 36301-160, Brazil
- Marcos Santos de Oliveira, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio, 74, PPGPSI sala 1.53, São João del-Rei, MG 36301-160, Brazil
- Journal Psychiatric Quarterly
- Online ISSN 1573-6709
- Print ISSN 0033-2720