Abstract
Claims about ‘empowerment’ increasingly animate debates about the ‘sexualization of culture’. This article responds to Lamb
and Peterson’s (2011) attempts to open up and complicate the notion of ‘sexual empowerment’ as it is used in relation to adolescent girls. Drawing
on contemporary research from the UK, New Zealand and elsewhere, the article seeks to promote a dialogue between media and
communications research and more psychologically oriented scholarship. The paper makes four arguments. First it points to
the need to rethink conceptualizations of the media, and processes of media influence. Secondly it raises critical questions
about the notion of ‘media literacy’ which has increasingly taken on the status of panacea in debates about young people and
‘sexualization’. Thirdly it highlights the curious absence of considerations of power in debates about sexual empowerment,
and argues for the need to think about sexualization in relation to class, ‘race’, sexuality and other axes of oppression.
Finally, it raises critical questions about the utility of the notion of sexual empowerment, given its individualistic framing,
the developmentalism implicit in its use, and the difficulties in identifying it in cultures in which ‘empowerment’ is used
to sell everything from liquid detergents to breast augmentation surgery.
and Peterson’s (2011) attempts to open up and complicate the notion of ‘sexual empowerment’ as it is used in relation to adolescent girls. Drawing
on contemporary research from the UK, New Zealand and elsewhere, the article seeks to promote a dialogue between media and
communications research and more psychologically oriented scholarship. The paper makes four arguments. First it points to
the need to rethink conceptualizations of the media, and processes of media influence. Secondly it raises critical questions
about the notion of ‘media literacy’ which has increasingly taken on the status of panacea in debates about young people and
‘sexualization’. Thirdly it highlights the curious absence of considerations of power in debates about sexual empowerment,
and argues for the need to think about sexualization in relation to class, ‘race’, sexuality and other axes of oppression.
Finally, it raises critical questions about the utility of the notion of sexual empowerment, given its individualistic framing,
the developmentalism implicit in its use, and the difficulties in identifying it in cultures in which ‘empowerment’ is used
to sell everything from liquid detergents to breast augmentation surgery.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Feminist Forum
- Pages 1-10
- DOI 10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1
- Authors
- Rosalind Gill, Centre for Culture, Media and Creative Industries, King’s College London, Chesham Building, Strand Campus, London, WC2R 2LS UK
- Journal Sex Roles
- Online ISSN 1573-2762
- Print ISSN 0360-0025