Abstract
We used the framework identified by the National Implementation Research Network’s (NIRN) analysis of 35 years of implementation
outcomes literature from diverse fields of endeavor to review the current state of wraparound implementation research. Model
definition, model fidelity and intervention outcomes were areas of relatively greater development, while target population,
theory base and theory of change, organizational context and readiness, staff selection, training, supervision or coaching,
purveyor selection, and program installation were less examined or even overlooked. We conclude with suggestions for building
a research agenda on wraparound implementation.
outcomes literature from diverse fields of endeavor to review the current state of wraparound implementation research. Model
definition, model fidelity and intervention outcomes were areas of relatively greater development, while target population,
theory base and theory of change, organizational context and readiness, staff selection, training, supervision or coaching,
purveyor selection, and program installation were less examined or even overlooked. We conclude with suggestions for building
a research agenda on wraparound implementation.
- Content Type Journal Article
- DOI 10.1007/s10826-010-9430-3
- Authors
- Rosalyn M. Bertram, School of Social Work, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
- Jesse C. Suter, Center on Disability and Community Inclusion, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
- Eric J. Bruns, School of Medicine, Division of Public Behavioral Health and Justice Policy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
- Koren E. O’Rourke, School of Social Work, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
- Journal Journal of Child and Family Studies
- Online ISSN 1573-2843
- Print ISSN 1062-1024