The Affective Temperaments: Differences between Adolescents in the Big Five Model and Cloninger’s Psychobiological Model of Personality

Positive (PA) and negative affect (NA) are indicators or markers of well-being that also reflect stable emotional- temperamental
dispositions. In three different studies, self-reported affect was measured by the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule
(PANAS). The PANAS measures affect as two separate dimensions and was therefore used to generate four affective temperaments
(AFTs): self-actualizing (high PA and Low NA), high affective (high PA and high NA), low affective (low PA and low NA), and
self-destructive (low PA and high NA). The present set of studies investigated differences in personality between AFTs in
an adolescent sample (N = 398). Personality was measured by two different models: The Big Five and Cloninger’s psychobiological model. The interaction
of PA and NA was expected to reveal differences and similarities in intrapersonal behavior measured by both models of personality.
The results show that low NA adolescents reported lower levels of neurotic behavior than high NA adolescents. Nevertheless,
despite the experience of high NA respectively, low PA, high and low affective reported higher Self-Directedness than self-destructive
adolescents. Implications of the AFTs framework are discussed.