Abstract
Although not common, self-induced abortion continues to exist in the contemporary United States, where women are being criminalized
for the practice. This paper analyzes the reasons that women have for inducing their own abortions given the existence of
legal alternatives. It argues that changes in medical technologies and information technologies have made self-abortions safer
and more accessible, while structural and cultural barriers have limited access to legal abortions. While some feminists and
reproductive rights advocates have problematized the practice of self-aborting itself as dangerous and indicative of the deterioration
of the rights guaranteed under Roe v Wade, this paper suggests that feminists must turn their attentions to changing the terms under which abortion is treated under
the law.
for the practice. This paper analyzes the reasons that women have for inducing their own abortions given the existence of
legal alternatives. It argues that changes in medical technologies and information technologies have made self-abortions safer
and more accessible, while structural and cultural barriers have limited access to legal abortions. While some feminists and
reproductive rights advocates have problematized the practice of self-aborting itself as dangerous and indicative of the deterioration
of the rights guaranteed under Roe v Wade, this paper suggests that feminists must turn their attentions to changing the terms under which abortion is treated under
the law.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Article
- Pages 1-17
- DOI 10.1007/s12147-011-9105-4
- Authors
- Tiana Bakić Hayden, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Journal Gender Issues
- Online ISSN 1936-4717
- Print ISSN 1098-092X