ABSTRACT
Background
Cancer survivors and their caregivers can experience interdependent symptoms.
Aims
The objective of this research was to determine if participation in a telephone delivered interpersonal counseling intervention, compared to an educational intervention, increases observed dyadic interdependence in depression, anxiety, and other symptoms in cancer survivors and their informal caregivers.
Method
A dyadic sample of survivors in treatment for solid tumor cancers and their caregivers participated in a 17-week sequential multiple assignment trial of symptom management interventions. Participants completed weekly measures of depression, anxiety, and other symptoms. Initially, all survivors and caregivers received a Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH) intervention. Survivors who still had unresolved depression or anxiety symptoms after 4 weeks were randomized with their caregivers to continue with SMSH alone or add a telephone interpersonal counseling (TIPC) intervention for the next 8 weeks (N = 87). For this sample, the lagged-dependent Actor-Partner Interdependence Model was used to estimate longitudinal actor and partner effects for each of the three symptom measures. Interaction terms representing intervention condition (SMSH vs. SMSH + TIPC) were entered into the models to determine if intervention moderated the observed actor or partner effects.
Results
The caregiver→survivor partner effect for anxiety was significantly stronger in the SMSH + TIP arm compared to the SMSH alone arm. No other moderation effects were observed.
Conclusions
Participating in the interpersonal counseling intervention as an addition to an educational intervention delivered to both members of a survivor-caregiver dyad does not appear to affect dyadic interdependence in symptoms other than anxiety.