Abstract
Anticipating the duration of a labor strike can be vital for both sides of the dispute, as well as outside observers. The
methods of a pair of studies using Canadian data are surveyed to analyze labor strikes in the United States from 1992 to 2008.
Corrections are made for strikes with predetermined lengths (“one-day” strikes and the like), whose durations are more a function
of the prior announcements than of other factors, such as number of employees striking and macroeconomic conditions. Strikes
are found to be generally shorter when the striking unit represents a larger portion of the firm’s total workers, a proxy
for its bargaining power. This ratio provides a better understanding of the strike dynamics (including expected length) than
do sheer bargaining unit size or sheer firm size.
methods of a pair of studies using Canadian data are surveyed to analyze labor strikes in the United States from 1992 to 2008.
Corrections are made for strikes with predetermined lengths (“one-day” strikes and the like), whose durations are more a function
of the prior announcements than of other factors, such as number of employees striking and macroeconomic conditions. Strikes
are found to be generally shorter when the striking unit represents a larger portion of the firm’s total workers, a proxy
for its bargaining power. This ratio provides a better understanding of the strike dynamics (including expected length) than
do sheer bargaining unit size or sheer firm size.
- Content Type Journal Article
- DOI 10.1007/s12122-010-9094-1
- Authors
- Gregory Brian Finley, George Mason University Fairfax VA USA
- Journal Journal of Labor Research
- Online ISSN 1936-4768
- Print ISSN 0195-3613