• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

The Culturally Minded Independent Psychological Examiner: A Review of Indian and Chinese Cultural Characteristics and its Implications for Psychological Injury

Abstract

Culture is a broad term that refers to attitudes, social behaviours, norms, and beliefs held by a given population. It can manifest in different ways, such as social behaviours and religion. Given the influence of culture on our behaviour in society, these different cultural characteristics may have implications for the experience of psychological injury and how it should be understood in the context of an independent psychological examination for the court. Understanding cultural differences is becoming increasingly important in Canada due to the heterogeneity of Canada’s population. Indeed, 10% of Canada’s population are of either Indian or Chinese origin. To increase reliability of their assessments to individuals from these countries, assessors should develop a deeper understanding of unique cultural characteristics that can affect independent assessment presentation and ultimately, interpretation and conclusions related to information and test results gathered in the assessment. This review aimed to outline unique Indian and Chinese cultural aspects that may contribute to variation in psychological injury expression, perception, test interpretation, and conclusions for court. After searching the research literature, 28 articles met the review criteria. Overall, the results demonstrated several unique cultural factors that can affect psychological symptoms, including family relationships, symptom somatization, stigma, and language. This review discusses similarities and differences between Indian and Chinese cultures and potential implications for assessments by independent psychological examiners.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 08/22/2024 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice