Abstract
Introduction
Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent mental health disorder which is characterised by high levels of morbidity. Most individuals with OCD do not receive adequate psychotherapeutic intervention. Research suggests that taboo intrusive thoughts are less likely to be recognised as OCD in comparison to more recognisable forms. Stigma attributions are higher for individuals with taboo intrusive thoughts. The aim of this study is to examine psychotherapists’ capacity to recognise different forms of OCD, their recommendations for psychotherapeutic intervention, and stigma attributions towards clients with OCD symptoms.
Methodology
Five hundred fourteen psychotherapists in Ireland were randomly assigned a vignette describing a client with different OCD presentations—paedophilia, aggressive, religious, homosexuality, contamination and symmetry. Participants gave their interpretations of the presenting symptoms, their therapy recommendations and rated their confidence in their responses. Perceived dangerousness and willingness to work with the client were also investigated.
Results
The taboo intrusive thoughts vignettes were significantly less likely to be recognised as OCD than the contamination and symmetry vignettes. Participants attributed greater levels of stigma to clients with aggressive and paedophilia intrusive thoughts. Recommendations for evidence-based therapies were low. Participants who recognised OCD were significantly more likely to recommend an evidence-based therapy. Confidence was a poor predictor of OCD identification and evidence-based therapy recommendation.
Conclusions
The results suggest a lack of awareness of certain types of OCD presentation amongst psychotherapists, the meaning of the symptoms and of evidence-based psychotherapeutic interventions for OCD. The implications of this, and possible applications of these results, are discussed.