Abstract
The phenomenological resemblance between pathological gambling (PG) and obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) has led to suggestions that PG be categorized as an obsessive–compulsive-spectrum disorder (OCSD). This study aimed to explore whether PG resembles OCD in terms of personality and temperament.
Fifteen patients with PG, 18 patients with OCD, and 33 healthy control subjects were included in the study. The study subjects
were all male and drug naïve. We analyzed data obtained from three self-report questionnaires assessing personality, impulsiveness,
and affect: the short version of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11),
and the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Participants with PG and OCD demonstrated less conscientiousness
(F = 7.089, P = .002) and less openness to experience (F = 6.268, P = .003) and less positive affect (F = 15.816, P < .001) than did healthy controls. The two diagnostic groups did not differ from each other with respect total BIS-11 scores,
but those with OCD showed more neuroticism than did those with PG and healthy controls (
F = 9.556, P < .001), and those with PG obtained higher scores on the non-planning impulsiveness factor of BIS-11 than did those with OCD or healthy
controls (
F = 9,835, P < .001). PG and OCD share similar profiles in terms of personality and temperament. This study provides phenomenological evidence
supporting the conceptualization of PG as an OCSD.
Fifteen patients with PG, 18 patients with OCD, and 33 healthy control subjects were included in the study. The study subjects
were all male and drug naïve. We analyzed data obtained from three self-report questionnaires assessing personality, impulsiveness,
and affect: the short version of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11),
and the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Participants with PG and OCD demonstrated less conscientiousness
(F = 7.089, P = .002) and less openness to experience (F = 6.268, P = .003) and less positive affect (F = 15.816, P < .001) than did healthy controls. The two diagnostic groups did not differ from each other with respect total BIS-11 scores,
but those with OCD showed more neuroticism than did those with PG and healthy controls (
F = 9.556, P < .001), and those with PG obtained higher scores on the non-planning impulsiveness factor of BIS-11 than did those with OCD or healthy
controls (
F = 9,835, P < .001). PG and OCD share similar profiles in terms of personality and temperament. This study provides phenomenological evidence
supporting the conceptualization of PG as an OCSD.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-12
- DOI 10.1007/s10899-011-9269-6
- Authors
- Jae Yeon Hwang, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences-World Class University program, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Young-Chul Shin, Department of Psychiatry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108, Pyung-dong, Jongno-Ku, Seoul, 110-746 Republic of Korea
- Se-Won Lim, Department of Psychiatry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108, Pyung-dong, Jongno-Ku, Seoul, 110-746 Republic of Korea
- Hye Youn Park, Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Na Young Shin, Clinical Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Neuroscience Institute, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Joon Hwan Jang, Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hye-Yoon Park, Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Jun Soo Kwon, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences-World Class University program, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Journal Journal of Gambling Studies
- Online ISSN 1573-3602
- Print ISSN 1050-5350