• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Elevated parathyroid hormone levels and cognitive function: A systematic review

Publication date: March–April 2020

Source: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Volume 87

Author(s): Wen Jiang, Cheng-yang Hu, Feng-li Li, Xiao-guo Hua, Kai Huang, Xiu-jun Zhang

Abstract
Objective

To systematically estimate the association between elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and cognitive function.

Methods

This review was conducted on ten papers identified through database searches from inception to 31 October 2018. The quality of studies was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist.

Results

There is a low volume of data reporting on the impact of elevated PTH levels on cognitive impairment. The quality of the identified studies ranged from poor (37 %) to good (76 %). Although the results from studies were mixed, one cross-sectional study and one prospective study suggested a link between elevated PTH levels and a decrease in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. Three cross-sectional studies that assessed other cognitive domain in specific domains, such as language, memory and executive function provided mixed results for an association between elevated PTH levels and cognitive function. Two studies showed mixed evidence for a link between elevated PTH levels and poor executive function. One prospective study, one cross-sectional study and three case-control studies provide mixed evidence for an association between higher PTH levels and Alzheimer´s disease (AD). Two studies showed limited evidence for an association between elevated PTH levels and vascular dementia.

Conclusion

This review presented that the level of evidence available to support an association between elevated PTH levels and cognitive function was generally weak and inconsistent. Future studies with more better methodological quality are needed.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 01/27/2020 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice