Since the comparative turn in European integration research, analyses of the legislative process of the EU have taken inspiration from research on national political systems. While the consequences of the formal monopoly of initiative of the Commission are much analysed, it is only recently that the role of the Court in EU legislation is further appreciated. In the literature, it is disputed in how far case law constrains the EU legislator. The analysis of the 2016 proposal for a revision of the 1996 Posted Workers Directive allows uncovering the mechanisms by which the European judiciary shapes and constraints agenda‐setting based on the constitutionalisation of EU law. In this highly political case, being hailed as a major breakthrough, we ask whether political majorities or case‐law constraints had the upper hand.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.