Price affects the demand for cigarettes, indicating that smokers, perhaps especially lower income smokers, may choose low nicotine cigarettes if they were commercially available and cost less than fully nicotinized conventional cigarettes. The present study tests the hypothesis that smokers will prefer purchasing low nicotine cigarettes at a lower price point than conventional cigarettes given a fixed budget.
A laboratory-based, within-subject, 3 (nicotine level) x 3 (price) factorial design provided smokers opportunities to purchase standard (0.7 per mg tobacco) -, moderately reduced (0.3 mg), and very low-nicotine (0.03 mg) Spectrum research cigarettes according to an escalating price structure (low-nicotine costing the least, high-nicotine costing the most) given a fixed, laboratory-provided “income”. Participants were 20 overnight-abstinent smokers who previously smoked and rated each of the 3 cigarettes.
Overall, smokers rated low nicotine cigarettes (LNC) as less satisfying compared to standard nicotine cigarettes (SNC), t(18) = -5.40, p <.001. In the free-choice session, subjects were more likely to choose LNC that cost less compared to SNC that cost more, even after an eight-hour abstinence period, F (2,19) = 4.32, p = .03. Those selecting LNC or moderate nicotine cigarettes (MNC) after abstinence smoked more cigarettes per day, t(17) = 2.40, p = .03 and had higher dependence scores on the HONC, t(18) = 2.21, p =.04 that those selecting SNC.
The results indicate that smokers’ response to price points when purchasing cigarettes may extend to LNC if these were commercially available. Differential cigarettes prices based on nicotine content may result in voluntary selection of less addicting products.
The FDA has proposed a rule that would reduce nicotine content in commercially available cigarettes. However, it is not known how smokers may respond in an environment where products of differing nicotine content and of differing prices are available. This study demonstrates that price may be an important factor that could lead smokers to select reduced nicotine products voluntarily, even if those products are rated as inferior or less satisfying.