Abstract
While most research shows increasing happiness across the adult life-span, there is a common and persistent misconception
that happiness decreases with age. In two experiments, we found evidence to suggest that this age–happiness bias results in part from a biased search for exemplars in memory. When provided with specific exemplars, aged 30 or 70, showing
clear evidence of an active and sociable lifestyle, happiness estimates were unaffected by age. However, we also found evidence
that the bias may influence judgments by invoking different standards for young and old. Among participants in the United
States in Experiment 1, a negative lifestyle description resulted in negative happiness ratings for a 30 year-old and neutral
ratings for a 70 year-old, suggesting that the lifestyle was considered normative for the older adults. Among Irish participants
in Experiment 2, we found no such distinction, arguably because of cultural differences in social expectations across the
generations. These studies help to reveal the judgment mechanisms behind the age-happiness bias, and identify the boundaries
of this persistent bias.
that happiness decreases with age. In two experiments, we found evidence to suggest that this age–happiness bias results in part from a biased search for exemplars in memory. When provided with specific exemplars, aged 30 or 70, showing
clear evidence of an active and sociable lifestyle, happiness estimates were unaffected by age. However, we also found evidence
that the bias may influence judgments by invoking different standards for young and old. Among participants in the United
States in Experiment 1, a negative lifestyle description resulted in negative happiness ratings for a 30 year-old and neutral
ratings for a 70 year-old, suggesting that the lifestyle was considered normative for the older adults. Among Irish participants
in Experiment 2, we found no such distinction, arguably because of cultural differences in social expectations across the
generations. These studies help to reveal the judgment mechanisms behind the age-happiness bias, and identify the boundaries
of this persistent bias.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-12
- DOI 10.1007/s10902-011-9284-4
- Authors
- Heather P. Lacey, Department of Applied Psychology, Bryant University, 1150 Douglas Pike, Smithfield, RI 02917, USA
- Todd A. Kierstead, Department of Applied Psychology, Bryant University, 1150 Douglas Pike, Smithfield, RI 02917, USA
- Diana Morey, Department of Applied Psychology, Bryant University, 1150 Douglas Pike, Smithfield, RI 02917, USA
- Journal Journal of Happiness Studies
- Online ISSN 1573-7780
- Print ISSN 1389-4978