Abstract
This paper traces the historical development as well as the analytical and ideological uses of “industrial society” as an
object of knowledge. The binary opposition traditional society/industrial society and the latter tripartite division traditional,
industrial, post-industrial society have been central to the development of sociology as a discipline. Like all analytical
concepts “industrial society” is both a way of seeing and not seeing. It focuses attention on some social attributes and processes
rather than others. The first objective of this paper is to evaluate whether or not this object of knowledge focuses attention
on crucial aspects of social life, or whether, instead, it shrouds and distorts more than it reveals. The second objective
is to evaluate the ideological import of the concept. Did it, and does it still, provide a realistic and achievable model
of the way we ought to live together?
object of knowledge. The binary opposition traditional society/industrial society and the latter tripartite division traditional,
industrial, post-industrial society have been central to the development of sociology as a discipline. Like all analytical
concepts “industrial society” is both a way of seeing and not seeing. It focuses attention on some social attributes and processes
rather than others. The first objective of this paper is to evaluate whether or not this object of knowledge focuses attention
on crucial aspects of social life, or whether, instead, it shrouds and distorts more than it reveals. The second objective
is to evaluate the ideological import of the concept. Did it, and does it still, provide a realistic and achievable model
of the way we ought to live together?
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-16
- DOI 10.1007/s12108-011-9135-0
- Authors
- Devereaux Kennedy, Sociology Department, Grand Valley State University, 2170 Ausable Hall, Allendale, MI, USA
- Journal The American Sociologist
- Online ISSN 1936-4784
- Print ISSN 0003-1232