Abstract
Students’ achievement goals in school have received increasing research attention because they have been shown to be important
in predicting important outcomes. As such, there has been a growing interest in measuring and comparing them across different
cultural groups. However, these comparisons cannot be made until validity evidence has been attained to support the use of
an instrument in the new cultural setting. In this study, we investigated the cross-cultural applicability of the Inventory
of School Motivation (ISM, McInerney et al. American Educational Research Journal 34:207-236, 1997) in the Hong Kong Chinese and Philippine contexts using both within-network and between-network approaches to construct validation.
The ISM measures four types of achievement goals: mastery, performance, social, and extrinsic goals. 1,406 high school students
from Hong Kong (n = 697) and the Philippines (n = 709) participated. Results of the within-network test showed that the ISM had good internal consistency reliability and
the confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the hypothesized four-factor model. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses
supported invariance of factor loadings across the two samples. The between-network test also indicated that these achievement
goals correlated systematically with different aspects of students’ self-concepts. These findings support the applicability
of the ISM among Hong Kong Chinese and Filipino students.
in predicting important outcomes. As such, there has been a growing interest in measuring and comparing them across different
cultural groups. However, these comparisons cannot be made until validity evidence has been attained to support the use of
an instrument in the new cultural setting. In this study, we investigated the cross-cultural applicability of the Inventory
of School Motivation (ISM, McInerney et al. American Educational Research Journal 34:207-236, 1997) in the Hong Kong Chinese and Philippine contexts using both within-network and between-network approaches to construct validation.
The ISM measures four types of achievement goals: mastery, performance, social, and extrinsic goals. 1,406 high school students
from Hong Kong (n = 697) and the Philippines (n = 709) participated. Results of the within-network test showed that the ISM had good internal consistency reliability and
the confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the hypothesized four-factor model. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses
supported invariance of factor loadings across the two samples. The between-network test also indicated that these achievement
goals correlated systematically with different aspects of students’ self-concepts. These findings support the applicability
of the ISM among Hong Kong Chinese and Filipino students.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-19
- DOI 10.1007/s12187-011-9117-3
- Authors
- Ronnel B. King, The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education, Room 101 Hui Oi Chow Science Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
- Fraide A. Ganotice, Palawan State University, Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Philippines
- David A. Watkins, The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education, Room 101 Hui Oi Chow Science Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
- Journal Child Indicators Research
- Online ISSN 1874-8988
- Print ISSN 1874-897X