Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol 55(5), Oct 2024, 405-416; doi:10.1037/pro0000565
Despite efforts to incorporate evidence-based practice into mental health settings, there has been inconsistent success doing so. Several barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice have been identified, including limitations in time and statistical training. One promising approach to further bridge the science-practice gap is the greater use of meta-analytic studies to clarify the magnitude of treatment effects and to understand components of treatments that are more effective within specific populations. Although several articles have been published to help mental health trainees and providers understand and interpret meta-analyses, they may not be sufficient without extensive training in statistical techniques. The purpose of this article is to provide and explain the use of the Meta-Analysis Application Worksheet as a means by which mental health providers at all professional levels can use meta-analytic findings to make clinical judgments regarding treatment approaches in the context of ongoing or new cases. A case example is provided to illustrate the use of the worksheet in clinical decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)