Archives of Scientific Psychology, Vol 9(1), Jul 1 , 2021, 1-11; doi:10.1037/arc0000076
Given the critical importance of manuscript review, the development of a more evidence-based approach is needed. Manuscript review is the final step in the research process, and limitations in this aspect of the process may have a negative impact on the quality of published research in psychology and in other disciplines as well. This article examines current findings regarding the strengths and limitations of manuscript review and identifies ways that the process can be improved. To move toward a more evidence-based framework, the current conceptualization of the review process as a method for evaluating manuscripts must be complemented by an appreciation of two dynamics that help shape this process. First, manuscript review is a signal-detection task wherein reviewers and editors attempt to distinguish signals (publishable manuscripts) from noise (manuscripts that do not warrant publication). Second, manuscript review involves a complex social interaction among authors, reviewers, and editors, each of whom brings particular goals to the endeavor and each of whom must communicate with multiple audiences simultaneously to achieve those goals. The practical implications of research in this area are discussed, and preliminary steps for moving toward a more evidence-based approach to manuscript review are outlined. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)