Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the current meta-analysis was to provide an estimate of the prevalence of physical and emotional neglect by integrating
prevalence figures from the body of research reporting on neglect. An attempt was also made to unravel the substantial variation
in prevalence figures reported in primary studies by analyzing the effects of procedural factors and sample characteristics
on combined prevalence rates.
prevalence figures from the body of research reporting on neglect. An attempt was also made to unravel the substantial variation
in prevalence figures reported in primary studies by analyzing the effects of procedural factors and sample characteristics
on combined prevalence rates.
Methods
Studies providing prevalence rates of child neglect were searched using electronic databases, exploring specialized journals,
and by searching references of publications for other relevant studies. Data were extracted using a coding system. Intercoder
reliability was satisfactory. A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted.
and by searching references of publications for other relevant studies. Data were extracted using a coding system. Intercoder
reliability was satisfactory. A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted.
Results
Child physical neglect prevalence rates were found for 13 independent samples with a total of 59,406 participants, and child
emotional neglect prevalence rates were found for 16 independent samples with a total of 59,655 participants. The overall
estimated prevalence was 163/1,000 for physical neglect, and 184/1,000 for emotional neglect, with no apparent gender differences.
The influence of research design factors on the prevalence of physical neglect was more pronounced than on the prevalence
of emotional neglect. Studies on physical neglect in ‘low-resource’ countries were conspicuously absent.
emotional neglect prevalence rates were found for 16 independent samples with a total of 59,655 participants. The overall
estimated prevalence was 163/1,000 for physical neglect, and 184/1,000 for emotional neglect, with no apparent gender differences.
The influence of research design factors on the prevalence of physical neglect was more pronounced than on the prevalence
of emotional neglect. Studies on physical neglect in ‘low-resource’ countries were conspicuously absent.
Conclusions
Child neglect is a problem of considerable extent, but seems to be a neglected type of maltreatment in scientific research.
This is illustrated by the deplorable dearth of studies on child neglect, especially in low-resource countries. Recommendations
for the design of future prevalence studies are proposed.
This is illustrated by the deplorable dearth of studies on child neglect, especially in low-resource countries. Recommendations
for the design of future prevalence studies are proposed.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-11
- DOI 10.1007/s00127-012-0549-y
- Authors
- Marije Stoltenborgh, Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
- Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
- Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
- Journal Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Online ISSN 1433-9285
- Print ISSN 0933-7954