Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, Vol 46(1), Feb 2026, 39-54; doi:10.1037/teo0000292
The empirical study of emotion is a comparatively young endeavor, long left to the wayside in favor of more tangible psychological phenomena. In the past few decades, however, several theories have emerged, examining emotion in the context of reason or cognition, accelerating a cultural shift in how we view the phenomenon. This development, partly facilitated by technological advances in neuroscience, has nudged emotions from their empirical rut. But emotions have been with us all along, embedded in our makeup, molding our consciousness and interactions with people and the world. While research on emotions is relatively new in empirical domains, affective experiences have long been studied elsewhere, notably in the Buddhist Abhidhamma. The Buddhist study of mental phenomena encapsulated in the Abhidhamma is not merely descriptive but a systematic, hierarchical classification of the experiential, including emotion, grounded in theory. These mental factors bear a likeness to components of modern, process theories of emotion. In this article, the similarities between the Buddhist theory of mental factors and the component process model of emotion will be highlighted as an example of the likeness between Buddhist and modern Western psychologies. This comparative exercise serves a broader aim to identify the Abhidhamma as a potential repository of theories from which modern-day empirical hypotheses can be derived. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)