• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Immortal time bias in the association between retirement age and mortality

In their 2016 paper, Wu et al reported that each 1-year increase in retirement age was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92), concluding that early retirement may be a risk factor for mortality.1 The published Cox specification classifies participants by a future retirement age while follow-up begins at the 1992 baseline, creating guarantee-time bias.2 3 A participant who retires at age 70 must have survived from baseline to that age, a span of 9–19 years depending on birth year. The Cox model counts this preretirement person-time as time at risk, mechanically biasing the HR downward. Even a 5-year contrast implies roughly 44% lower mortality (HR 0.895=0.56), a large effect for a single behavioural choice in an observational study.

Using the same HRS initial cohort, I reconstructed a closely comparable sample from public RAND and HRS core files (N=3212 vs the…

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 05/28/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice