• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Exploring Implicit Emotional Associations With Death in Patients With Current Suicidal Ideation: Results From Novel Attitude Implicit Association Tests for Suicide

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Assessing suicide risk in clinical settings is challenging, as conventional self-report scales have limited predictive validity. The Death Implicit Association Test (D-IAT) was developed to explore implicit associations related to death and the self-concept. However, it omits the emotional association with death that may be crucial in suicide risk assessment. This cross-sectional study on individuals with current suicidal ideation integrates the implicit emotional association with death into the conventional D-IAT.

Methods

We aimed to explore whether patients with current suicidal ideation exhibit more positive implicit emotional associations with death compared to a clinical control group without current suicidal ideation and lifetime suicidal behavior (total N = 182). We employed the standard identity D-IAT (D-IATme/not me) and two novel attitude D-IAT versions (D-IATI like/I don’t like, D-IATpleasant/unpleasant). Furthermore, we compared all versions regarding their predictive and discriminative validity and analyzed correlations between implicit associations and self-reported suicidal ideation.

Results

In the D-IATme/not me and D-IATI like/I don’t like version, patients with current suicidal ideation exhibited weaker negative associations with death compared to clinical controls. The D-IATpleasant/unpleasant did not yield a group difference. The D-IATme/not me showed superior performance in predictive validity and a similar performance in discriminative validity as the D-IATI like/I don’t like. These two versions correlated positively with self-reported current suicidal ideation. In the D-IATpleasant/unpleasant, no such correlation was found.

Discussion

Our findings substantiate the validity and reliability of the identity D-IAT and suggest the D-IATI like/I don’t like as a potential complementary attitude variant with personalized categories. Incorporating implicit emotional associations when working with suicidal patients could enhance the evaluation and treatment of individuals at risk of suicide. Further investigation is warranted to gain a more comprehensive understanding of these relationships.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 11/02/2025 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice