• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

It is past time to abandon the term “dark” as a descriptor of antagonistic traits.

Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, Vol 134(7), Oct 2025, 691-692; doi:10.1037/abn0001024

Imagine an article that offers a model of the manifestations of low intelligence, titled the “D(umb) Factor of Low Intelligence.” Many psychologists would object to this label as being stigmatizing, unhelp ful, vague, and offensive. Yet a similarly troublesome term has slipped into the psychological literature without protest—the use of “dark” as a descriptor of antagonistic constructs (e.g., psychopathy, narcissism). The ubiquity with which this term has become embedded in psychology is disconcerting. We write to object to this term’s use as it is stigmatizing, sensationalistic, inaccurate, and problematic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 11/05/2025 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice