Urban Affairs Review, Ahead of Print.
There exists a contradiction in the literature on city size and policy outcomes between those who expect a positive relationship between city size and policy outcomes and those who expect mid-sized cities to be best at providing services. I evaluate this contradiction in the context of climate policy through original fieldwork in four mid-sized cities. Additionally, existing studies of climate policy in mid-sized cities focus on internal best practices for climate policy, while the broader literature on urban climate politics emphasizes the intersectional nature of economic and political context. I evaluate how these previous findings, drawn from research in large or small communities, apply to mid-sized cities. I find that, for my cities, the relationship between size and policy is more nuanced than previous findings expect, while institutions, state capacity, and environmental coalitions all play a crucial role. Finally, I highlight the importance of overcoming the physical legacy of industrialization.