• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Appropriateness of lumbar spine radiography and factors influencing imaging ordering patterns: paving the path towards value-driven healthcare

Abstract
Background

The demand for diagnostic imaging continues to rise. Against the backdrop of rising healthcare costs and finite resources, this has prompted a paradigm shift towards value-driven patient care. Inappropriate imaging is a barrier towards achieving this goal, which runs counter to prevailing evidence-based guidelines and contributes to rising healthcare costs. Our objective was to evaluate the appropriateness of lumbar spine X-rays in a tertiary referral emergency department and assess whether physician specialization and years of experience influence appropriateness.

Methods

Retrospective review of 1030 lumbar spine radiographs performed in an emergency department of an academic medical centre over a consecutive 3-month period. Referral indications were reviewed for adherence to 2021 American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness guidelines for low back pain, and referral pattern evaluated among physician groups based on specialist training and years in practice.

Results

63.8% of lumbar spine radiograph were appropriate, with trauma being the most common indication. 36.2% orders were inappropriate, with low back pain of less than 6 weeks duration being the most common indication. Significant differences in inappropriate orders was found (p<0.001) across physician groups: qualified Emergency Medicine specialists (20.9% inappropriate orders), specialists in-training (27.8%) and non-specialists with ≥3 (60.0%) and <3 (36.9%) years in practice, respectively.

Conclusion

Approximately a third of lumbar spine radiography performed in the emergency room were inappropriately ordered by ACR guidelines; specialist training and years in practice affected referral patterns. Integrating evidence-based appropriateness guidelines into the physician order workflow and targeting older non-specialists may promote more judicious imaging and reduce healthcare costs.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 04/21/2023 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice