Abstract
Corporatisation, the conversion of state‐owned enterprises into semi‐autonomous, legally independent entities, has gained in popularity internationally since the 1980s. This review suggests that usage of the term has become entangled with other definitions of corporatisation, and other organisational reforms associated with new public management, and appears consequently to have lost its distinctiveness in many contemporary studies of corporatisation. Through a scoping review of literature on corporatisation of healthcare organisations internationally, we develop a typology of four perspectives on corporatisation (as managerialism of medical work, as institutional level reform to encourage market‐like behaviour, as corporate governance implications of legal independence, and as private sector colonisation) and analyse the specific processes, impacts, and mediators associated with each approach. This typology can aid conceptual clarity in future research on corporatisation and orient practitioners to particular management and policy questions within the complex field of reform signified by this term.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.