• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Reducing Postoperative Opioid Pill Prescribing via a Quality Improvement Approach

Abstract
Background

The opioid epidemic has been fueled by prescribing unnecessary quantities of opioid pills for postoperative use. While evidence mounts that postoperative opioids can be reduced or eliminated, implementing such changes within various institutions can be met with many barriers to adoption. To address excess opioid prescribing within our institutions, we applied a plan-do-study-act (PDSA)-like quality improvement strategy to assess local opioid prescribing and use, modify our institutional protocols, and assess the impacts of the change. We describe our approach, findings, and lessons learned from our quality improvement approach.

Methods

We prospectively recorded home pain pill usage after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at two academic institutions from July 2016 to July 2019. Patients prospectively recorded their home pain pill use on a take-home log. Other factors, including numeric pain rating scale on day of discharge, were extracted from patient records. We analyzed our data and modified opioid prescription protocols to meet the reported use data of 80% of patients. We continued collecting data after the protocol change. We also used our prospectively collected data to assess the accuracy of a retrospective phone survey designed to measure post-discharge opioid use. Our primary outcomes were the proportion of patients taking 0 opioid pills post-discharge, median pills taken after discharge, and number of excess pills prescribed but not taken. We compared these outcomes before and after protocol change.

Results

266 patients (193 RALP, 73 RAPN) were included. Reducing the standard number of prescribed pills did not increase the percentage of patients taking zero pills post-discharge in either group (RALP: 47% vs. 41%; RAPN 48% vs. 34%). Patients in either group reporting postoperative day 1 (POD1) pain score of 0 or 1 were much more likely to use zero post-discharge opioid pills. Our reduction in prescribing protocol resulted in an estimated reduction of excess pills from 1,555 excess pills in the prior protocol to just 155 excess pills in the new protocol.

Conclusion

Our PDSA-like approach led to an acceptable protocol revision resulting in significant reductions in excess pills released into the community. Reducing the quantity of opioids prescribed postoperatively does not increase the percentage of patients taking zero pills post-discharge. To eliminate opioid use may require no-opioid pathways. Our approach can be used in implementing zero opioid discharge plans, and can be applied to opioid reduction interventions at other institutions where barriers to reduced prescribing exist.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 06/30/2021 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2023 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice