Abstract
It is a truism to remind ourselves that scientific theory is a human product subject to many of the same social processes
that govern other social acts. Science, however, whether social or natural, pretends to claim a higher mission, a more sophisticated
methodology, and more consequential and reliable outcomes than human efforts arising from other spheres. The present paper
examines the propagation, ascension, acceptance, and demise of twentieth century criminological theories in the United States.
Data from publications in peer reviewed journals over the last 30 years suggest that several non-scientific factors are most
influential in determining which theories are tested, cited, and discussed in criminological circles.
that govern other social acts. Science, however, whether social or natural, pretends to claim a higher mission, a more sophisticated
methodology, and more consequential and reliable outcomes than human efforts arising from other spheres. The present paper
examines the propagation, ascension, acceptance, and demise of twentieth century criminological theories in the United States.
Data from publications in peer reviewed journals over the last 30 years suggest that several non-scientific factors are most
influential in determining which theories are tested, cited, and discussed in criminological circles.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-19
- DOI 10.1007/s12108-012-9156-3
- Authors
- Robert C. Hauhart, Saint Martin’s University, Lacey, WA, USA
- Journal The American Sociologist
- Online ISSN 1936-4784
- Print ISSN 0003-1232