Abstract
This paper considers the ways in which research into the psychological contract of volunteers have been constrained by the
direct transfer of measures from the study of employees, and more generally by the assumptions in the dominant psychological
contract discourse. After examining these assumptions the paper proposes a revised research agenda, open to the possibility
that the psychological contract of volunteers is affected by expectations arising from socio-cultural influences beyond the
volunteer/manager relationships, and in particular, from the expectations of relative freedom in volunteering and from subjective
perceptions of volunteering as (variously) serious leisure, unpaid work, or activism. Understanding the contract as socially
constructed reveals the need to juxtapose the expectations of managers and volunteers in order to understand the contract
as a social relationship.
direct transfer of measures from the study of employees, and more generally by the assumptions in the dominant psychological
contract discourse. After examining these assumptions the paper proposes a revised research agenda, open to the possibility
that the psychological contract of volunteers is affected by expectations arising from socio-cultural influences beyond the
volunteer/manager relationships, and in particular, from the expectations of relative freedom in volunteering and from subjective
perceptions of volunteering as (variously) serious leisure, unpaid work, or activism. Understanding the contract as socially
constructed reveals the need to juxtapose the expectations of managers and volunteers in order to understand the contract
as a social relationship.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-20
- DOI 10.1007/s11266-012-9294-9
- Authors
- Geoff Nichols, Management School, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT UK
- Journal Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
- Online ISSN 1573-7888
- Print ISSN 0957-8765