Abstract
In our joint theoretical piece (Lamb and Peterson 2011), we attempted to find points of agreement and further elucidate points of disagreement in relation to the challenging issue
of adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. In particular, we evaluated the divisive question of whether girls’ subjective feelings
of sexual empowerment qualify as some useful version of empowerment. We are grateful to the commentators for joining us in
this productive and collaborative conversation. In this response, we summarize some of the themes raised by the commentators,
and we look for points of agreement around which we, as feminists, can continue to build a conversation on this polarizing
issue. We also attempt to better explore the possible relationship between subjective empowerment and political empowerment
by resurrecting the idea that “the personal is political.”
of adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. In particular, we evaluated the divisive question of whether girls’ subjective feelings
of sexual empowerment qualify as some useful version of empowerment. We are grateful to the commentators for joining us in
this productive and collaborative conversation. In this response, we summarize some of the themes raised by the commentators,
and we look for points of agreement around which we, as feminists, can continue to build a conversation on this polarizing
issue. We also attempt to better explore the possible relationship between subjective empowerment and political empowerment
by resurrecting the idea that “the personal is political.”
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Feminist Forum
- Pages 1-6
- DOI 10.1007/s11199-012-0150-6
- Authors
- Zoë D. Peterson, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Sharon Lamb, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
- Journal Sex Roles
- Online ISSN 1573-2762
- Print ISSN 0360-0025