Abstract
During recent years, mindfulness-based approaches have been gaining relevance for treatment in clinical populations. Correspondingly,
the empirical study of mindfulness has steadily grown; thus, the availability of valid measures of the construct is critically
important. This paper gives an overview of the current status in the field of self-report assessment of mindfulness. All eight
currently available and validated mindfulness scales (for adults) are evaluated, with a particular focus on their virtues
and limitations and on differences among them. It will be argued that none of these scales may be a fully adequate measure
of mindfulness, as each of them offers unique advantages but also disadvantages. In particular, none of them seems to provide
a comprehensive assessment of all aspects of mindfulness in samples from the general population. Moreover, some scales may
be particularly indicated in investigations focusing on specific populations such as clinical samples (Cognitive and Affective
Mindfulness Scale, Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire) or meditators (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Three main open
issues are discussed: (1) the coverage of aspects of mindfulness in questionnaires; (2) the nature of the relationships between
these aspects; and (3) the validity of self-report measures of mindfulness. These issues should be considered in future developments
in the self-report assessment of mindfulness.
the empirical study of mindfulness has steadily grown; thus, the availability of valid measures of the construct is critically
important. This paper gives an overview of the current status in the field of self-report assessment of mindfulness. All eight
currently available and validated mindfulness scales (for adults) are evaluated, with a particular focus on their virtues
and limitations and on differences among them. It will be argued that none of these scales may be a fully adequate measure
of mindfulness, as each of them offers unique advantages but also disadvantages. In particular, none of them seems to provide
a comprehensive assessment of all aspects of mindfulness in samples from the general population. Moreover, some scales may
be particularly indicated in investigations focusing on specific populations such as clinical samples (Cognitive and Affective
Mindfulness Scale, Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire) or meditators (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Three main open
issues are discussed: (1) the coverage of aspects of mindfulness in questionnaires; (2) the nature of the relationships between
these aspects; and (3) the validity of self-report measures of mindfulness. These issues should be considered in future developments
in the self-report assessment of mindfulness.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category ORIGINAL PAPER
- Pages 1-12
- DOI 10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9
- Authors
- Claudia Bergomi, Department of Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Laupenstrasse 49, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Wolfgang Tschacher, Department of Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Laupenstrasse 49, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Zeno Kupper, Department of Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Laupenstrasse 49, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Journal Mindfulness
- Online ISSN 1868-8535
- Print ISSN 1868-8527