Abstract
Methods
The QLQ-C30, BR23, and EurQOL-EQ-5D were assessed at baseline and at the end of the first hospitalization. We used the then-test
approach to characterize changes in internal standards by calculating the mean difference between the then-test (retrospective
measure) and pre-test baseline QoL assessments. The Ideal Scale Approach was also used to assess changes in standards by comparing
health and QoL expectancies between baseline and the end of the first hospitalization. Successive Comparison Approach was
used to assess changes in values through the longitudinal assessment of the relative importance of EuroQOL dimensions.
approach to characterize changes in internal standards by calculating the mean difference between the then-test (retrospective
measure) and pre-test baseline QoL assessments. The Ideal Scale Approach was also used to assess changes in standards by comparing
health and QoL expectancies between baseline and the end of the first hospitalization. Successive Comparison Approach was
used to assess changes in values through the longitudinal assessment of the relative importance of EuroQOL dimensions.
Results
The results of this study showed that recalibration RS effects occurred early after the first hospitalization for 6/15 dimensions
of QLQ-C30 (emotional, cognitive, fatigue, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhea) and 2/8 of BR-23 (future perspective, systemic
therapy side effects). Moreover, health and QoL expectancies changed between the baseline and the end of the first hospitalization,
and changes in values were seen for the self-care and usual activities dimensions of the EuroQOL-EQ-5D.
of QLQ-C30 (emotional, cognitive, fatigue, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhea) and 2/8 of BR-23 (future perspective, systemic
therapy side effects). Moreover, health and QoL expectancies changed between the baseline and the end of the first hospitalization,
and changes in values were seen for the self-care and usual activities dimensions of the EuroQOL-EQ-5D.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-11
- DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0135-5
- Authors
- T. S. Dabakuyo, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- F. Guillemin, Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Inserm, CIC-EC, and CHU, Nancy, France
- T. Conroy, Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, Dijon, France
- M. Velten, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, EA 3430, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- D. Jolly, Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, Dijon, France
- M. Mercier, Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, Dijon, France
- S. Causeret, Surgery Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- J. Cuisenier, Surgery Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- O. Graesslin, Gynecological and Obstetric Department, Institut Mère Enfant, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France
- M. Gauthier, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- F. Bonnetain, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Journal Quality of Life Research
- Online ISSN 1573-2649
- Print ISSN 0962-9343