• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift

Abstract

Purpose  

Response shift (RS), a change in the meaning of an individual’s self-evaluation of a target construct, such as health-related
quality of life (HRQOL), can affect the interpretation of change in measures of the construct collected over time. This study
proposes new statistical methods to test for reprioritization RS, in which the relative importance of HRQOL domains changes
over time.

Methods  

The methods use descriptive discriminant analysis or logistic regression models and bootstrap inference to test for change
in relative importance weights (Method 1) or ranks (Method 2) for discriminating between patient groups at two occasions.
The methods are demonstrated using data from the Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Cohort Study (n = 388). Reprioritization of domains from the IBD Questionnaire (IBDQ) and SF-36 was investigated for groups with active and
inactive disease symptoms.

Results  

The IBDQ bowel symptoms and SF-36 bodily pain domains had the highest ranks for group discrimination. Using Method 1, there
was evidence of reprioritization RS in the IBDQ social functioning domain and the SF-36 bodily pain and social functioning
domains. Method 2 did not detect change for any of the domains.

Conclusions  

Compared to IBD patients without active disease symptoms, those with active symptoms were likely to change the meaning of
their self-evaluations of pain and social interactions. Further research is needed to compare these new RS detection methods
under a variety of data analytic conditions before recommendations about the optimal method can be made.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Pages 1-9
  • DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0198-3
  • Authors
    • Lisa M. Lix, School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
    • Tolulope T. Sajobi, School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
    • Richard Sawatzky, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada
    • Juxin Liu, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
    • Nancy E. Mayo, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
    • Yuhui Huang, University of Regina, Regina, Canada
    • Lesley A. Graff, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • John R. Walker, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • Jason Ediger, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • Ian Clara, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • Kathryn Sexton, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • Rachel Carr, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • Charles N. Bernstein, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
    • Journal Quality of Life Research
    • Online ISSN 1573-2649
    • Print ISSN 0962-9343
Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 06/18/2012 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice