Abstract
This paper argues that prostitution policy is less developed than more established policy domains such as health, education,
social welfare, or the environment. While all policy is about the struggle over values and categories, conceptually prostitution
policy can best be understood as an instance of morality politics. Without hypostatizing morality politics, we define it as
having six characteristics: it is ruled by an explicit ideology; experts have limited authority as everyone feels they “own”
prostitution policy; it is highly emotionally charged; it is resistant to facts; the symbolism of policy formulation is seen
as more important than policy implementation; and it is subject to abrupt changes. We then analyze three implications of the
adversarial nature of prostitution policy. First, we discuss the cavalier attitude of relevant actors towards precise and
reliable numbers. Second, by focusing on “forced prostitution” and “trafficking”, we discuss the ideological and obfuscating
nature of key concepts in prostitution policy. We suggest instead using the concept of “exploitation”. Finally, we focus on
policy implementation. We argue that the common concept of policy regime has limited value and that to understand the development
of prostitution policy, its outcomes, and its impact on society, attention to the mundane details of policy implementation
is required. The paper suggests some conditions to prevent prostitution policy to enter the realm of morality politics and
to attain an effective and humane form of policy making.
social welfare, or the environment. While all policy is about the struggle over values and categories, conceptually prostitution
policy can best be understood as an instance of morality politics. Without hypostatizing morality politics, we define it as
having six characteristics: it is ruled by an explicit ideology; experts have limited authority as everyone feels they “own”
prostitution policy; it is highly emotionally charged; it is resistant to facts; the symbolism of policy formulation is seen
as more important than policy implementation; and it is subject to abrupt changes. We then analyze three implications of the
adversarial nature of prostitution policy. First, we discuss the cavalier attitude of relevant actors towards precise and
reliable numbers. Second, by focusing on “forced prostitution” and “trafficking”, we discuss the ideological and obfuscating
nature of key concepts in prostitution policy. We suggest instead using the concept of “exploitation”. Finally, we focus on
policy implementation. We argue that the common concept of policy regime has limited value and that to understand the development
of prostitution policy, its outcomes, and its impact on society, attention to the mundane details of policy implementation
is required. The paper suggests some conditions to prevent prostitution policy to enter the realm of morality politics and
to attain an effective and humane form of policy making.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-14
- DOI 10.1007/s13178-012-0095-0
- Authors
- Hendrik Wagenaar, Department of Town and Regional Planning, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Sietske Altink, Leiden University-Campus Den Haag, Postbus 13228, 2501 EE Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Journal Sexuality Research and Social Policy
- Online ISSN 1553-6610
- Print ISSN 1868-9884