Abstract
This essay elaborates the common insight that “strong” communities respond more successfully to serious threats than “weak”
communities and it claims that the successful communities will have better population health rates. It nominates an appropriate
measure of population health as the criterion of success, and advances a universally applicable concept of strength, conceptualized
as institutionalized problem-solving capacity, based on three components: the application of specialized knowledge, open debate
on policy alternatives and mobilization behind reformers and reform movements. The relationship may be compressed into a threat-capacity
ratio interaction formula: ph = C/t where ph is a measure of population health, C is problem-solving capacity and t is one
or more existential threats. The community is the locus of causality and it is assumed that communities attempt to adapt to
threats by problem-solving. The Threat-Capacity dynamic is explained by a combination of neo-Darwinian and neo-Durkheimian
theory. Three kinds of applications support its plausibility.
communities and it claims that the successful communities will have better population health rates. It nominates an appropriate
measure of population health as the criterion of success, and advances a universally applicable concept of strength, conceptualized
as institutionalized problem-solving capacity, based on three components: the application of specialized knowledge, open debate
on policy alternatives and mobilization behind reformers and reform movements. The relationship may be compressed into a threat-capacity
ratio interaction formula: ph = C/t where ph is a measure of population health, C is problem-solving capacity and t is one
or more existential threats. The community is the locus of causality and it is assumed that communities attempt to adapt to
threats by problem-solving. The Threat-Capacity dynamic is explained by a combination of neo-Darwinian and neo-Durkheimian
theory. Three kinds of applications support its plausibility.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-13
- DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0141-6
- Authors
- Frank W. Young, Cornell University, 318 Sunnyview Lane, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
- Journal Social Indicators Research
- Online ISSN 1573-0921
- Print ISSN 0303-8300