Abstract
Methods
Stepwise regression, factor analysis, and item-scaling principles were used to derive and guide item selection using data
from a large general sample in the Netherlands (n = 5,211) and a “wheezing illness” sample (n = 138). Item internal consistency, discriminant validity, and floor and ceiling effects were evaluated using a general Dutch
sample (Salland Region n = 410) and two clinical samples: Functional abdominal pain (FAP, n = 81) and Burn (n = 194). Reliabilities were estimated using Cronbach’s alpha. Relative precision (RP), the ability to distinguish between
clinical subgroups, was computed by comparing the proportion of variance explained by the short-form scales versus respective
full-length scales.
from a large general sample in the Netherlands (n = 5,211) and a “wheezing illness” sample (n = 138). Item internal consistency, discriminant validity, and floor and ceiling effects were evaluated using a general Dutch
sample (Salland Region n = 410) and two clinical samples: Functional abdominal pain (FAP, n = 81) and Burn (n = 194). Reliabilities were estimated using Cronbach’s alpha. Relative precision (RP), the ability to distinguish between
clinical subgroups, was computed by comparing the proportion of variance explained by the short-form scales versus respective
full-length scales.
Results
The ITQOL was reduced from 97 to 47 items. Median alpha coefficients were 0.77 Salland sample, 0.76 (FAP), and 0.84 (Burn).
Ninety-one to 100 % scaling successes for item discriminant validity were observed for 21 of 24 tests (8 scales, 3 samples).
Floor effects were not observed; some ceiling effects were detected. RP estimates in the Salland sample ranged from 2.40 (physical
abilities) to 0.58 (temperament and moods). RP estimates in the FAP sample were 0.85 (bodily pain), 1.36 (temperament and
moods) and 1.62 (parental-impact emotional) and for Burn, 1.51 (temperament and moods) and 0.59 (general health perceptions).
Ninety-one to 100 % scaling successes for item discriminant validity were observed for 21 of 24 tests (8 scales, 3 samples).
Floor effects were not observed; some ceiling effects were detected. RP estimates in the Salland sample ranged from 2.40 (physical
abilities) to 0.58 (temperament and moods). RP estimates in the FAP sample were 0.85 (bodily pain), 1.36 (temperament and
moods) and 1.62 (parental-impact emotional) and for Burn, 1.51 (temperament and moods) and 0.59 (general health perceptions).
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-12
- DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0177-8
- Authors
- Jeanne M. Landgraf, HealthActCHQ, Two Canal Park 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA
- Ineke Vogel, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rianne Oostenbrink, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Margriet E. van Baar, Association of Dutch Burn Centers, Burn Centre Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Hein Raat, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Journal Quality of Life Research
- Online ISSN 1573-2649
- Print ISSN 0962-9343