Abstract
Relating students’ evaluations of teaching (SETs) to student learning as an approach to validate SETs has produced inconsistent
results. The present study tested the hypothesis that the strength of association of SETs and student learning varies with
the criteria used to indicate student learning. A multisection validity approach was employed to investigate the association
of SETs and two different criteria of student learning, a multiple-choice test and a practical examination. Participants were
N = 883 medical students, enrolled in k = 32 sections of the same course. As expected, results showed a strong positive association between SETs and the practical
examination but no significant correlation between SETs and multiple-choice test scores. Furthermore, students’ subjective
perception of learning significantly correlated with the practical examination score whereas no relation was found for subjective
learning and the multiple choice test. It is discussed whether these results might be due to different measures of student
learning varying in the degree to which they reflect teaching effectiveness.
results. The present study tested the hypothesis that the strength of association of SETs and student learning varies with
the criteria used to indicate student learning. A multisection validity approach was employed to investigate the association
of SETs and two different criteria of student learning, a multiple-choice test and a practical examination. Participants were
N = 883 medical students, enrolled in k = 32 sections of the same course. As expected, results showed a strong positive association between SETs and the practical
examination but no significant correlation between SETs and multiple-choice test scores. Furthermore, students’ subjective
perception of learning significantly correlated with the practical examination score whereas no relation was found for subjective
learning and the multiple choice test. It is discussed whether these results might be due to different measures of student
learning varying in the degree to which they reflect teaching effectiveness.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-17
- DOI 10.1007/s11162-012-9260-9
- Authors
- Sebastian Stehle, Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 15, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Birgit Spinath, Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Martina Kadmon, Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Journal Research in Higher Education
- Online ISSN 1573-188X
- Print ISSN 0361-0365