Abstract
This paper examines the historical origins and theoretical underpinnings of the maps of the city of Chicago produced by sociologists
at the University of Chicago between 1920 and 1934. I argue that the three mapping schemes produced in those years—the concentric
zone map of The City (1925), the base map of 75 community areas and the census tract maps published in three volumes of Census Data of the City of Chicago (1920, 1930, 1934)—draw upon distinct historical antecedents and have distinct theoretical implications. The first scheme
exhibits the strong influence of Johann Heinrich von Thünen’s location theory and maps produced by early Chicago city boosters,
the second most clearly exhibits the influence of the Social Survey Movement and of pragmatist philosophy and the third, the
influence of the financial and governmental interests of the organizations that made up the Chicago Census Committee. Literature
on early urban sociology and mapping in Chicago has hitherto not adequately differentiated these three mapping schemes or
problematized the implications of their differences for our understanding of the theoretical commitments of the “Chicago School.”
at the University of Chicago between 1920 and 1934. I argue that the three mapping schemes produced in those years—the concentric
zone map of The City (1925), the base map of 75 community areas and the census tract maps published in three volumes of Census Data of the City of Chicago (1920, 1930, 1934)—draw upon distinct historical antecedents and have distinct theoretical implications. The first scheme
exhibits the strong influence of Johann Heinrich von Thünen’s location theory and maps produced by early Chicago city boosters,
the second most clearly exhibits the influence of the Social Survey Movement and of pragmatist philosophy and the third, the
influence of the financial and governmental interests of the organizations that made up the Chicago Census Committee. Literature
on early urban sociology and mapping in Chicago has hitherto not adequately differentiated these three mapping schemes or
problematized the implications of their differences for our understanding of the theoretical commitments of the “Chicago School.”
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-30
- DOI 10.1007/s12108-012-9160-7
- Authors
- B. Robert Owens, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA
- Journal The American Sociologist
- Online ISSN 1936-4784
- Print ISSN 0003-1232